Chemguide: Support for CIE A level Chemistry
Learning outcome 18.1(a)
This statement is about the formation of aldehydes and ketones by the oxidation of alcohols, their reduction back to alcohols using NaBH4 or LiAlH4, and their reactions with HCN and NaCN.
Before you go on, you should find and read the statement in your copy of the syllabus.
Start by reading the page introducing aldehydes and ketones.
This covers naming and physical properties, together with a brief introduction to the reactivity of the compounds.
Throughout the Chemguide pages in this section, you will find that I have deliberately left out aldehydes or ketones containing a benzene ring. CIE do, however, want you to know about phenylethanone, which is a ketone made up of a benzene ring with a -COCH3 group attached:
In almost all cases, the presence of the benzene ring doesn't change its characteristic ketone properties. There is one case (which probably won't be asked in an exam) where there is a difference, and I will point that out when it is relevant.
Statement 18.1(a)(i): The formation of aldehydes and ketones from alcohols
You will find this on the page about making aldehydes and ketones.
CIE is happy for you to use the simple versions of the equations with oxygen in square brackets.
Statement 18.1(a)(ii): The reduction of aldehydes and ketones
You should read the page about reduction of aldehydes and ketones. This contains more information than you need.
Concentrate mostly on the first section headed "Background to the reactions".
Comparing the reduction of carbonyls with the reduction of alkenes
CIE have asked questions in the past involving the use of two different reducing agents for these bonds.
NaBH4 and LiAlH4 are reagents which reduce C=O double bonds, but will not reduce C=C double bonds. The normal reducing agent for C=C double bonds is hydrogen in the presence of a nickel catalyst.
Why won't NaBH4 and LiAlH4 reduce C=C?
This isn't on the syllabus, but CIE have expected you to know that this is the case. An outstanding student might work out the fact that you can't use these reagents to reduce C=C, but most people would just have to learn it - and since it isn't on the syllabus, why should you do that? There is no simple answer to that!
If it helps you to remember, you can think of it like this.
C=C double bonds in alkenes are reactive because of the high electron density around the pi bond. They are attacked by electrophiles - things attracted to negative charges.
But the reactive bits of NaBH4 and LiAlH4 lie in the negative ions, BH4- and AlH4-. These would be repelled by the pi bond, and so no reaction is possible.
Will hydrogen and nickel reduce C=O double bonds?
There is no mention of this in the syllabus anywhere.
There is also a lot of confusion about it. You will find books which say that you can reduce C=O bonds with Ni / hydrogen, and you will find books which say that you can't. CIE have twice commented on this in Examiner's Reports - once they complained that students didn't know that Ni / hydrogen could reduce C=O, and once they implied that it couldn't.
The facts would appear to be that Ni / hydrogen will reduce C=O, but more slowly than it reduces C=C.
So what do you do about this? I have had an e-mail conversation with CIE about this, and they say
That is the line you should therefore take.
Statement 18.1(a)(iii): The reaction of aldehydes and ketones with HCN and NaCN
You should read the first part of the page about simple addition to aldehydes and ketones. You don't need the reaction with sodium hydrogensulphite.
In CIE questions they tend to talk about using hydrogen cyanide in the presence of some cyanide ions (from sodium or potassium cyanide). You will understand the reason for this when you look at the mechanism in the next statement 18.1(b).
Don't worry about the reactions mentioned in "Uses of the reaction" for now, although it might be a good idea to come back and have a look at it when you have finished all the organic chemistry. It wouldn't be too difficult to make up an exam question out of this.
© Jim Clark 2011 (last modified May 2017)